Making sexually explicit material available to a child, Luring a child, Possessing child sexual abuse material

R. v. L.P.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked18 months in custody1
Judge imposed16 months jail (12 months concurrent on luring/s. 171.1, 4 months consecutive on s. 163.1), then 18 months probation1
60 days less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked18 months in custody
Judge imposed16 months in custody
Defence asked12 months conditional sentence
Minimum6 months struck down
For making sexually explicit material available to a child (CC 171.1), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with a mandatory minimum of 6 months that courts have struck down as unconstitutional. The sentence imposed is 9% of the maximum. Read the section.

The offender was found guilty after trial of child luring, making sexually explicit material available to a child, and a child sexual abuse and exploitation material offence, arising from online communications with a 12-year-old. The Crown sought 18 months in custody; the defence sought a conditional sentence of 12 to 15 months. Judge Driscoll imposed 16 months in custody followed by 18 months of probation, finding that a conditional sentence could not provide the denunciation and deterrence the facts required.

In the judge's words

In all the circumstances, I am not satisfied that a CSO, even a lengthy one with punitive conditions, can provide the strong message of denunciation and deterrence that these facts require.

1

The record

Prior convictions
0 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
12 months conditional sentence1
Mandatory minimum
Found unconstitutional or not applied under a binding ruling1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: Adam McCulley
Defence: Donald Murray, K.C.

Sources

  1. R. v. L.P., 2026 NSPC 48 Court decision, CanLII, January 20, 2026[8] The crown is seeking a total sentence of 18 months in custody (s. 171.1(1)(a) 12 months, s. 172.1(1)(a) 12 months concurrent, s. 163.1(4) 6 months consecutive) to be followed by probation of 2 years.[9] The defence is seeking a Conditional Sentence Order of 12-15 months followed by 18 months of probation, the appropriate SOIRA order, DNA, and a s. 161 prohibition order (no specific time).[21] The section 171.1(1)(a) offence and the s. 172.1(1)(a) offence each have a maximum sentence of 14 years and no minimum sentence that is constitutional. The s. 163.1 offence has a ten-year maximum and no constitutional minimum.[61] On the other hand, the accused has no record.[74] In all the circumstances, I am not satisfied that a CSO, even a lengthy one with punitive conditions, can provide the strong message of denunciation and deterrence that these facts require.[67] Therefore the final sentence is 12 months on the 171.1(1)(a) and the 172.1(1)(a) concurrent and 4 months consecutive on the s. 163.1 offence. … [74] In all the circumstances, I am not satisfied that a CSO, even a lengthy one with punitive conditions, can provide the strong message of denunciation and deterrence that these facts require. Therefore, the total sentence of 16 months will be served in an institution.
  2. R. v. L.P., 2026 NSPC 48 Court decision, Courts of Nova Scotia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.