Failure to comply with a sex offender registration order
R. v. Keddy
Sentence and the Crown's position
What the law allows
Ian Gerald Keddy was found guilty after trial of failing to comply with a sex offender registration order, his second conviction for failing to report. The Crown sought 3 to 4 months of straight time and the defence a 90-day intermittent sentence. Judge Daley imposed 90 days of incarceration on a straight time basis, finding that specific deterrence required a period of true custody.
In the judge's words
1While I agree that the step principle does apply, I do not agree that the appropriate remedy is an intermittent sentence. I find that a period of true custody is required in these circumstances.
The record
Sources
- R. v. Keddy, 2026 NSPC 36 Court decision, CanLII, July 28, 2026
[13] The Crown seeks a period of incarceration of 3 to 4 months of straight time.
[14] The Defence seeks a 90-day sentence to be served intermittently and that Mr. Keddy be placed on probation when he is not in confinement pursuant to that intermittent sentence.
[1] This is the sentencing decision regarding Ian Gerald Keddy, who was charged with the following offence:
[33] … He was convicted of voyeurism and possession of child pornography, and the general facts of the allegations were entered on the record. … [35] As noted earlier in this decision, he was then charged with a failure to comply with the SOIRA Order, specifically failure to report, on October 20, 2022, was convicted and was sentenced on January 30, 2024.
[44] While I agree that the step principle does apply, I do not agree that the appropriate remedy is an intermittent sentence. I find that a period of true custody is required in these circumstances.
[50] I therefore sentence Mr. Keddy to a period of incarceration of 90 days on a straight time basis.
- Criminal Code, s. 490.031 Record, Justice Laws Website
- R. v. Keddy, 2026 NSPC 36 Court decision, Courts of Nova Scotia