Making sexually explicit material available to a child

R. v. A.B.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked18 months in custody1
Judge imposed12 months custody, then 2 years probation1
6 months less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked18 months in custody
Judge imposed12 months in custody
Defence asked90 days conditional sentence
Minimum6 months
For making sexually explicit material available to a child (CC 171.1), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with a mandatory minimum of 6 months. The sentence imposed is 7% of the maximum. Read the section.

The offender pleaded guilty to making sexually explicit material available to a person under 16, after sending a picture of his erect penis to a 15-year-old girl over whom he held a position of trust. The Crown sought 18 months of custody followed by probation; the defence asked for three to six months served in the community and argued the six-month mandatory minimum was unconstitutional. Judge Heerema imposed 12 months of custody followed by two years of probation, saying a clear message must be sent that children are off-limits sexually, and declined to rule on the minimum because the sentence exceeded it.

In the judge's words

A clear message must be sent to A.B. and to all members of society that children are off-limits sexually, especially to those who are trusted adults in their lives.

1

The record

Prior convictions
0 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
90 days conditional sentence1
Mandatory minimum
Applied1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: Alex Keaveny
Defence: Michelle James

Sources

  1. R. v. A.B., 2024 NSPC 9 Court decision, CanLII, January 25, 2024[6] The Crown submits that an appropriate sentence in this case is one of 18 months of incarceration, followed by two years of probation, a DNA order and a SOIRA order.[5] He asks this Court not to apply the statutorily imposed minimum sentence and submits that three to six months of incarceration served in the community should be imposed, followed by 18 months of probation.[60] I return to the application by A.B. to have this court declare that the mandatory minimum in s. 171.1(2)(a) is unconstitutional in his case. I have found that a proper and fit sentence for A.B. exceeds the mandatory minimum sentence of 6 months.[47] … He is a man without a criminal record, and I can and do infer that this behaviour is out of character.[50] … A clear message must be sent to A.B. and to all members of society that children are off-limits sexually, especially to those who are trusted adults in their lives.[54] I believe that an appropriate sentence in this case is one of 12 months of custody, followed by two years of probation.
  2. R. v. A.B., 2024 NSPC 9 Court decision, Courts of Nova Scotia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.