Aggravated assault of a peace officer, Disarming a peace officer

R. v. R.B.M.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked10 years in custody1
Judge imposed7 years (6 years aggravated assault of a peace officer + 1 year consecutive for disarming), less 2,022 days credit (533 days remaining), then 3 years probation1
3 years less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked10 years in custody
Judge imposed7 years in custody
Defence askedTime served
For aggravated assault of a peace officer (CC 270.02), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 50% of the maximum. Read the section.

The offender was convicted after trial of aggravated assault of a peace officer and attempting to disarm a peace officer after he punched, kicked and stabbed a police officer in the eye and tried to take the officer's gun in Kelowna in March 2022. The Crown sought 10 years; the defence argued he should be released on time served. Justice Wilson imposed six years for the aggravated assault and one year consecutive for the disarming offence, less 2,022 days of credit for pre-sentence custody, followed by three years of probation, weighing the violence of the attack on a police officer against the reduced moral culpability linked to the offender's schizophrenia.

In the judge's words

In this case, the victim, of course, was a police officer, clearly acting within the scope of his duties which, based on the principles in Chaston, would suggest a higher sentence. This was a particularly violent attack on a police officer who was simply doing his job and it could have been fatal.

1

The record

Prior convictions
1 prior conviction, 1 violent1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
Time served1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: M. Ogi-Harris, J.C. Young
Defence: D.M. Turko, KC, C. McLaughlin

Sources

  1. R. v. R.B.M., 2025 BCSC 2668 Court decision, CanLII, November 28, 2025[5] The Crown submits that a fit global sentence for … is 10 years' imprisonment with individual sentences as follows: eight years under Count 2, one year under Count 3, and one year under Count 5, all consecutive.[6] The defence argues that … is in a time-served position and he is entitled to his release.[28] In terms of aggravating and mitigating circumstances, … has one previous conviction for an aggravated assault in Ontario.In this case, the victim, of course, was a police officer, clearly acting within the scope of his duties which, based on the principles in Chaston, would suggest a higher sentence. This was a particularly violent attack on a police officer who was simply doing his job and it could have been fatal.[51] After reviewing all of the authorities and the submissions, I find that the appropriate sentence here is six years under Count 2. … [52] The parties agree that one year on Count 3 that is consecutive to the sentence under Count 2 is appropriate and therefore I make that order, as well. … [54] In addition, I am also going to impose a sentence of three years of probation given that there are less than two years remaining in the sentence. … [65] THE COURT: 2,555 minus 2,022, equals 533 days remaining.
  2. Criminal Code, s. 270.02 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. R.B.M., 2025 BCSC 2668 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.