Aggravated assault of a peace officer, Disarming a peace officer

R. v. Telechea

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked6 years in custody1
Judge imposedTwo years less a day in custody (less 347 days' credit), then 3 years probation1
1461 days less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked6 years in custody
Judge imposed2 years less a day in custody
Defence asked2 years less a day conditional sentence
For aggravated assault of a peace officer (CC 270.02), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 14% of the maximum. Read the section.

Carlo Francisco Telechea pleaded guilty to aggravated assault of a peace officer and disarming a peace officer after beating a police sergeant with the officer's own baton in a Vancouver hotel lobby. The Crown sought six years in custody and the defence a conditional sentence of two years less a day. Justice Baker imposed two years less a day in custody, reduced from 30 months for totality, followed by three years of probation, citing Gladue factors and his progress in recovery while rejecting a conditional sentence.

In the judge's words

I find that a punitive sentence is required to reflect society's abhorrence of the use of violence and weapons in response to conflict. The sentence must also address general deterrence, given the importance of the safety of law enforcement in executing their duties. I do not agree a conditional sentence order would be appropriate in this case.

1

The record

Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
2 years less a day conditional sentence1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: J.A. Lawton
Defence: M.A. Patterson

Sources

  1. R. v. Telechea, 2024 BCSC 2220 Court decision, CanLII, October 18, 2024[27] The Crown seeks a term of incarceration of six years on Count 1, which is the assaulting a police officer, and one year consecutive on Count 2, which is disarming a police officer, resulting in an aggregate sentence of seven years. The Crown then submits the overall sentence should be reduced, applying the principle of totality, to six years in total, with 5.5 years for Count 1 and six months for Count 2.[29] Mr. Telechea seeks a conditional sentence order of two years less a day with three years' probation.[1] THE COURT: On April 17, 2023, Mr. Telechea pled guilty to aggravated assault of … contrary to s. 270.02 of the Criminal Code, and of disarming a peace officer, contrary to s. 270.1 of the Code.[51] … I find that a punitive sentence is required to reflect society's abhorrence of the use of violence and weapons in response to conflict. The sentence must also address general deterrence, given the importance of the safety of law enforcement in executing their duties. I do not agree a conditional sentence order would be appropriate in this case.[61] Mr. Telechea, could you please stand? For the reasons I have expressed, I sentence you to a total custodial sentence of two years less a day, which is 729 days, followed by three years of probation. You will receive presentence credit of 347 days, leaving you with 382 remaining days in custody.
  2. Criminal Code, s. 270.02 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. Telechea, 2024 BCSC 2220 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.