Luring a child, Sexual assault of a person under 16

R. v. Massie

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked4 years in custody1
Judge imposed4 years in custody (3 years sexual assault, 1 year luring consecutive)1

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked4 years in custody
Judge imposed4 years in custody
Defence asked30 months in custody
Minimum1 year
For luring a child (CC 172.1), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with a mandatory minimum of 1 year. The sentence imposed is 29% of the maximum. Read the section.

Vincent Massie pleaded guilty to sexual assault and child luring involving a 15-year-old he met online when he was 48. The Crown sought a global sentence of four years and the defence 30 months. Justice Giaschi imposed three years for the sexual assault and a consecutive one year for luring, for four years in total, citing the direction in Friesen that denunciation and deterrence take priority for sexual offences against children.

In the judge's words

Considering the various admonitions of the Supreme Court of Canada in Friesen and Bertrand Marchand, the circumstances of the offence, the circumstances of Mr. Massie, the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, the objectives of sentencing, and the comparable cases to which I have been referred, I am of the view that a fit, proper, and proportional sentence for the offence of sexual assault is three years' imprisonment and a fit, proper, and proportional sentence for the offence of luring is one year imprisonment, a sentence that both parties urged upon me.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
9 prior convictions, 1 violent1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
30 months in custody1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: D.D. Heighes
Defence: G.A.P. Verdurmen

Sources

  1. R. v. Massie, 2025 BCSC 1147 Court decision, CanLII, May 16, 2025[4] The Crown submits that a global sentence of four years' imprisonment is fit and proper.[4] … The defendant submits the total sentence should be 30 months or 2.5 years' imprisonment.[5] The circumstances of the offences are set out in the agreed statement of facts filed at the hearing as follows: … In the fall of 2018, Vincent Massie[41] The defendant's criminal record is an aggravating factor, notwithstanding that he has no prior convictions for sexual offences. His record includes nine offences as an adult from 1989 to May 2015. … 1992, assault for which he received 60 days;[59] Considering the various admonitions of the Supreme Court of Canada in Friesen and Bertrand Marchand, the circumstances of the offence, the circumstances of Mr. Massie, the aggravating and mitigating circumstances, the objectives of sentencing, and the comparable cases to which I have been referred, I am of the view that a fit, proper, and proportional sentence for the offence of sexual assault is three years' imprisonment and a fit, proper, and proportional sentence for the offence of luring is one year imprisonment, a sentence that both parties urged upon me.[63] On Count 3 of the indictment, sexual assault contrary to s. 271 of the Criminal Code, I sentence you to three years' imprisonment. [64] On Count 4 of the indictment, child luring contrary to s. 172.1 of the Criminal Code, I sentence you to one-year imprisonment to be served consecutively with the sentence imposed under Count 3.
  2. R. v. Massie, 2025 BCSC 1147 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.