Occupant of a motor vehicle knowing there is a firearm
R. v. Chiappe
Sentence and the Crown's position
What the law allows
Ryan Timothy Chiappe pleaded guilty, partway through a voir dire, to occupying a vehicle knowing a loaded .22 calibre pistol was in it. Crown and defence jointly proposed 18 months. Justice Tindale accepted the joint submission and imposed 547 days in custody less 459 days of enhanced pre-sentence credit, leaving 88 days to serve, plus a lifetime firearms prohibition, citing the early guilty plea, his efforts to address substance abuse and some difficulties with the Crown's case.
In the judge's words
1Certainly, in cases involving firearms, deterrence and denunciation is the primary consideration. Loaded handguns, particularly in vehicles in the wee hours of the morning, are a recipe for disaster and mischief within the community.
The record
Sources
- R. v. Chiappe, 2024 BCSC 2424 Court decision, CanLII, May 30, 2024
[6] I am told this is a joint submission for a sentence of 18 months less any time that has already been served by Mr. Chiappe. … [14] The joint submission is for 18 months or 547 days
[6] I am told this is a joint submission for a sentence of 18 months less any time that has already been served by Mr. Chiappe. … [14] The joint submission is for 18 months or 547 days
[1] THE COURT: Timothy Chiappe has entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 on Court File Number 77891-2 out of the Prince George Registry
[14] The joint submission is for 18 months or 547 days less the 399 days would leave 148 days' new jail time. Certainly, in cases involving firearms, deterrence and denunciation is the primary consideration. Loaded handguns, particularly in vehicles in the wee hours of the morning, are a recipe for disaster and mischief within the community.
[31] I am going to sentence you to 547 days in custody less time for enhanced pretrial credit of 459 days. So the remaining sentence that you will have to serve is 88 days, sir.
- Criminal Code, s. 94 Record, Justice Laws Website
- R. v. Chiappe, 2024 BCSC 2424 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia