Occupant of a motor vehicle knowing there is a firearm

R. v. Bujold

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked2 years in custody1
Judge imposed24 months custody less 357 days credit (373 days left to serve), then 12 months probation; 10-year weapons prohibition1

What the law allows

Maximum10 years
Crown asked2 years in custody
Judge imposed2 years in custody
Defence asked2 years in custody
For occupant of a motor vehicle knowing there is a firearm (CC 94(1)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 10 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 20% of the maximum. Read the section.

Jesse Bujold pleaded guilty to occupying a vehicle knowing there was a restricted firearm in it, after a January 2025 police chase near Dawson Creek during which a shotgun was fired from the truck at a police vehicle; he was not sentenced as the driver or the shooter. Crown and defence jointly proposed 24 months in custody, less time served, followed by 12 months of probation. Justice Doyle accepted the joint submission, finding it not contrary to the public interest, and imposed 24 months (730 days) less 357 days of pre-sentence credit, then 12 months of probation and a 10-year weapons prohibition.

In the judge's words

In the circumstances before me, I do not see any reason that this will be contrary to the public interest (R. v. Anthony‑Cook, 2016 SCC 43). I accept the joint submission of counsel. This is an appropriate disposition and will meet the principles of sentencing pursuant to s. 718, in particular, of the Criminal Code.

1

The record

Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
2 years in custody1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: G.R. Wool
Defence: D. McNamee

Sources

  1. R. v. Bujold, 2025 BCSC 1926 Court decision, CanLII, September 12, 2025[10] I have a joint submission by Crown and defence for a sentence of 24 months of custody, less time served, followed by 12 months of probation.[10] I have a joint submission by Crown and defence for a sentence of 24 months of custody, less time served, followed by 12 months of probation.[5] Mr. Bujold called this matter forward to plead guilty and has pleaded guilty before me today to the only offence on the Indictment, which was that, contrary to s. 94(1) of the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, C.‑c. 46, he occupied a vehicle, knowing there was a restricted firearm in it.[11] In the circumstances before me, I do not see any reason that this will be contrary to the public interest (R. v. Anthony‑Cook, 2016 SCC 43). I accept the joint submission of counsel. This is an appropriate disposition and will meet the principles of sentencing pursuant to s. 718, in particular, of the Criminal Code.[16] THE COURT: Twenty‑four months in custody is 730 days. I will deduct 357 days of that, further to the joint submission of counsel regarding the dead time at a 1.5 ratio. That leaves 373 days to be served.
  2. Criminal Code, s. 94 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. Bujold, 2025 BCSC 1926 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.