Robbery

R. v. Metcalfe

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked4 years in custody1
Judge imposed4 years imprisonment (joint submission), lifetime firearms ban, DNA order1

What the law allows

MaximumLife imprisonment
Crown asked4 years in custody
Judge imposed4 years in custody
Defence asked4 years in custody
For robbery (CC 344), the Criminal Code currently allows up to life imprisonment, with no mandatory minimum. Life is drawn at 25 years for scale. Read the section.

Alan Stuart Metcalfe pleaded guilty to robbing a Kelowna bank while masked and pointing an imitation handgun at employees, with 13 people inside. The Crown and defence jointly proposed four years. Justice Wilson accepted the joint submission and imposed four years' imprisonment, citing his criminal record for similar offences as the main aggravating factor and his guilty plea, youth and rehabilitative steps as mitigating.

In the judge's words

[18] In the circumstances I am prepared to accept the joint submission. The test on a joint submission is whether the proposed sentence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute or would otherwise be contrary to the public interest; R. v. Anthony-Cook, [2016] S.C.J. No. 43. I am satisfied that the proposed sentence should be approved and there is no reason to require a different sentence in these circumstances.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
4 years in custody1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: D. Reznikov
Defence: W. Jenson

Sources

  1. R. v. Metcalfe, 2023 BCSC 1728 Court decision, CanLII, August 29, 2023[9] This is a joint sentence submission. Both Crown and defence seek a four‑year sentence plus a couple of mandatory ancillary orders.[9] This is a joint sentence submission. Both Crown and defence seek a four‑year sentence plus a couple of mandatory ancillary orders.[2] Mr. Metcalfe pleaded guilty to one count of robbery pursuant to s. 344(1)(b) of the Criminal Code.[18] In the circumstances I am prepared to accept the joint submission. The test on a joint submission is whether the proposed sentence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute or would otherwise be contrary to the public interest; R. v. Anthony-Cook, [2016] S.C.J. No. 43. I am satisfied that the proposed sentence should be approved and there is no reason to require a different sentence in these circumstances.[20] I sentence you to four years' imprisonment, a lifetime firearms ban pursuant to s. 109 of the Criminal Code, and a mandatory DNA order under s. 487.051(1) of the Criminal Code.
  2. Criminal Code, s. 344 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. Metcalfe, 2023 BCSC 1728 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.