Manslaughter with a firearm, Robbery, Using an imitation firearm in the commission of an offence

R. v. A.R.K.K.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

  • On release at the time

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked11 years in custody1
Judge imposed12 years global (9 years manslaughter plus consecutive 4 years robbery and 1 year imitation firearm, reduced for totality), less 1,061 days' pre-sentence credit1

What the law allows

MaximumLife imprisonment
Crown asked11 years in custody
Judge imposed12 years in custody
Defence asked8 years in custody
Minimum4 years
For manslaughter with a firearm (CC 236(a)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to life imprisonment, with a mandatory minimum of 4 years. Life is drawn at 25 years for scale. Read the section.

The offender pleaded guilty to manslaughter with a firearm, and to robbery and using an imitation firearm while committing a robbery at a poker game in a Burnaby home two months earlier; he was on probation at the time. The Crown sought a global sentence of 11 to 13 years after totality; the defence sought eight years. Justice MacNaughton imposed nine years for manslaughter and a consecutive five years for the robbery offences, reduced to 12 years for totality, less 1,061 days' credit, citing his relative youth, limited record, difficult background as a refugee and harsh pandemic custody conditions.

In the judge's words

[130] The offences you committed are grave and demonstrated reckless and careless attitudes toward your victims and those around you. You engaged in extensive planning, and there is a similarity to the circumstances of all of your offences.

1

The record

Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
On probation1
Defence asked for
8 years in custody1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: M.P. Bussanich, S. Wan
Defence: J. Oppal

Sources

  1. R. v. A.R.K.K., 2023 BCSC 1175 Court decision, CanLII, July 6, 2023[56] The Crown submits that eight to ten years is a fit and appropriate sentence for manslaughter. … global sentence should be between 13 and 15 years' imprisonment, reduced to between 11 and 13 years after applying the totality principle.[57] The defence submits that, ordinarily, a fit and appropriate sentence for the manslaughter offence would be seven years' imprisonment. … global sentence should be 12 years, reduced to eight years after applying the totality principle.[48] … He was conditionally discharged and placed on probation for two years. He was on probation at the time of these offences.[130] The offences you committed are grave and demonstrated reckless and careless attitudes toward your victims and those around you. You engaged in extensive planning, and there is a similarity to the circumstances of all of your offences.[133] Based on the totality principle, I reduce your sentence to 12 years. [134] I grant you 1,061 days' credit for time spent in pre-sentence custody, leaving 3,319 days (or nine years and 34 days) left for you to serve on your sentences.
  2. R. v. A.R.K.K., 2023 BCSC 1175 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.