Indignity to human remains
R. v. Forrest and Russell
Sentence and the Crown's position
What the law allows
Kevin Forrest Jr. and a co-accused pleaded guilty to improperly interfering with human remains after they wrapped the body of a woman who had been killed in a residence and left it in a wooded area. They were not held responsible for her death. Counsel made a joint recommendation; Justice Duncan accepted it and sentenced Mr. Forrest to 1,172 days, deemed served by his 781 days of pre-sentence custody credited at 1.5 to 1.
In the judge's words
1In conclusion, the proposed sentences do satisfy the legal requirements to accept this joint recommendation. It is in the range of sentences to be a fit and proper disposition. It reflects due consideration to the applicable principles of sentencing, including the circumstances of the offence and of the offenders.
The record
- Convicted of
- Indignity to human remains (CC 182(b))
- Prior convictions
- Not recorded
- At the time of the offence
- On bail1
- Appeal
- Not yet checked
- Counsel
- Crown: Peter Harrison, Bronte Fudge-Lucas
Defence: Noel Fellows (for Forrest); Nicholaus (Nick) Fitch (for Russell)
Sources
- R. v. Forrest and Russell, 2026 NSSC 51 Court decision, CanLII, January 19, 2026
[34] The term “range of sentence” has been discussed today. There is no minimum sentence for this offence; that is, there may be circumstances where a court would not impose a jail sentence.
[1] Kevin Forrest Jr. and Cody Alexander Russell are to be sentenced after having entered pleas of guilty to the charge that:
[22] It is, as was argued by the Crown, aggravating that at the time of the commission of the offence before the Court, Mr. Forrest was bound by a Release Order dated October 31, 2023, a condition of which was that he keep the peace and be of good behaviour.
[65] In conclusion, the proposed sentences do satisfy the legal requirements to accept this joint recommendation. It is in the range of sentences to be a fit and proper disposition. It reflects due consideration to the applicable principles of sentencing, including the circumstances of the offence and of the offenders.
[67] Mr. Forrest has been in custody from December 1, 2023, until today (January 19, 2026). This totals 781 days of pre-sentence custody. Allowing for credit of 1.5: 1 day on remand, he has a credit of 1,172 days. In light of this, his sentence is 1,172 days which is considered served by his presence in court.
- R. v. Forrest and Russell, 2026 NSSC 51 Court decision, Courts of Nova Scotia