Indignity to human remains

R. v. Forrest and Russell

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown askedNot recorded
Judge imposedTime served: 781 days' remand credited at 1.5:1 as 1,172 days1

What the law allows

Maximum5 years
Judge imposed1172 days in custody
For indignity to human remains (CC 182(b)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 5 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 64% of the maximum. Read the section.

Kevin Forrest Jr. and a co-accused pleaded guilty to improperly interfering with human remains after they wrapped the body of a woman who had been killed in a residence and left it in a wooded area. They were not held responsible for her death. Counsel made a joint recommendation; Justice Duncan accepted it and sentenced Mr. Forrest to 1,172 days, deemed served by his 781 days of pre-sentence custody credited at 1.5 to 1.

In the judge's words

In conclusion, the proposed sentences do satisfy the legal requirements to accept this joint recommendation. It is in the range of sentences to be a fit and proper disposition. It reflects due consideration to the applicable principles of sentencing, including the circumstances of the offence and of the offenders.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
On bail1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: Peter Harrison, Bronte Fudge-Lucas
Defence: Noel Fellows (for Forrest); Nicholaus (Nick) Fitch (for Russell)

Sources

  1. R. v. Forrest and Russell, 2026 NSSC 51 Court decision, CanLII, January 19, 2026[34] The term “range of sentence” has been discussed today. There is no minimum sentence for this offence; that is, there may be circumstances where a court would not impose a jail sentence.[1] Kevin Forrest Jr. and Cody Alexander Russell are to be sentenced after having entered pleas of guilty to the charge that:[22] It is, as was argued by the Crown, aggravating that at the time of the commission of the offence before the Court, Mr. Forrest was bound by a Release Order dated October 31, 2023, a condition of which was that he keep the peace and be of good behaviour.[65] In conclusion, the proposed sentences do satisfy the legal requirements to accept this joint recommendation. It is in the range of sentences to be a fit and proper disposition. It reflects due consideration to the applicable principles of sentencing, including the circumstances of the offence and of the offenders.[67] Mr. Forrest has been in custody from December 1, 2023, until today (January 19, 2026). This totals 781 days of pre-sentence custody. Allowing for credit of 1.5: 1 day on remand, he has a credit of 1,172 days. In light of this, his sentence is 1,172 days which is considered served by his presence in court.
  2. R. v. Forrest and Russell, 2026 NSSC 51 Court decision, Courts of Nova Scotia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.