Manslaughter, Indignity to human remains

R. v. Losch

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked14 years in custody1
Judge imposed10 years for manslaughter plus 2 years consecutive for interfering with human remains (12 years total), less 1,280 days credit1
2 years less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

MaximumLife imprisonment
Crown asked14 years in custody
Judge imposed12 years in custody
Defence asked8 years in custody
For manslaughter (CC 236), the Criminal Code currently allows up to life imprisonment, with no mandatory minimum. Life is drawn at 25 years for scale. Read the section.

Gary Donald Losch was found guilty at trial of manslaughter and interfering with human remains after the victim was found stabbed and buried in a shallow grave near his marihuana grow site in Mission in 2017. The Crown sought 14 years in total; the defence sought six to eight years for manslaughter plus two years consecutive. Justice Dley imposed 10 years for manslaughter and two years consecutive for interfering with the remains, a total of 12 years less 1,280 days of credit, finding the offence closer to murder than to accident and that the aggravating factors outweighed his remorse and difficult upbringing.

In the judge's words

While Mr. Losch's personal circumstances and genuine remorse provide mitigating factors, they do not overtake the significant aggravating facts. Thus, I must place emphasis on denunciation, deterrence, and protection of the public.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
8 years in custody1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: M.A. MacDonald, K.C., K.R.D. Gillespie
Defence: J.A. Cochrane, S.E. Leamon

Sources

  1. R. v. Losch, 2025 BCSC 2591 Court decision, CanLII, December 18, 2025[3] The Crown seeks a jail sentence of 12 years on the manslaughter conviction and two years consecutive for interfering with human remains.[4] The defence says that the proper sentence should be six to eight years for manslaughter and two years consecutive for interfering with human remains.[2] Mr. Losch was charged with second degree murder of … and interfering with her remains contrary to ss. 235(1) and 182(b) of the Criminal Code of Canada, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-46 [Criminal Code]. He was found guilty of manslaughter and interfering with human remains.[64] While Mr. Losch's personal circumstances and genuine remorse provide mitigating factors, they do not overtake the significant aggravating facts. Thus, I must place emphasis on denunciation, deterrence, and protection of the public.[65] Mr. Losch shall be sentenced to 10 years in prison for manslaughter. He shall serve a further two years in jail consecutive for interfering with a dead body. A total of 12 years is proportionate to the gravity of the offences and Mr. Losch's moral culpability. … [87] THE COURT: All right. Credit will be given for 1,280 days. That will then be deducted from the total of 12 years that I have provided as a sentence.
  2. Criminal Code, s. 236 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. Losch, 2025 BCSC 2591 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.