Sexual exploitation of a young person, Sexual assault

R. v. P.J.H.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked12 years in custody1
Judge imposed8 years and 9 months in prison, concurrent with a 5-year sentence already being served (total incarceration of 9 years)1
1190 days less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked12 years in custody
Judge imposed8 years and 9 months in custody
Defence asked7 years and 6 months in custody
Minimum1 year
For sexual exploitation of a young person (CC 153), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with a mandatory minimum of 1 year. The sentence imposed is 62% of the maximum. Read the section.

The offender was convicted after trial of sexual exploitation of a 16-year-old and sexual assault of a 17-year-old in 2018, both vulnerable youths to whom he supplied drugs, and was already serving five years for sexual offences against another child. The Crown sought 12 to 14 years; the defence sought a further two and a half to three years, for a total of seven and a half to eight years. Justice A. Saunders imposed eight years and nine months concurrent with the existing sentence, for a total of nine years of incarceration, citing the offender's pattern of targeting vulnerable girls, lack of remorse and risk of reoffending.

In the judge's words

His pattern of befriending vulnerable girls, engaging in illicit drug use with them, and then sexually abusing them, and his utter lack of remorse, in my view, speak to a considerable risk of reoffending and point to the need for a lengthy prison sentence for the protection of the public.

1

The record

Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
7 years and 6 months in custody1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: S. Green
Defence: C.L. Sutton, N. Acker

Sources

  1. R. v. P.J.H., 2025 BCSC 405 Court decision, CanLII, February 18, 2025The Crown submitted that fit sentences would be in the range of seven to eight years in the case of S., followed by a consecutive sentence of five to six years for the sexual assault of F., for a total global sentence of 12 to 14 years.Instead, … asked for the imposition of only a further two and a half to three years globally, in addition to the five years already imposed, to give a total period of incarceration of seven and a half to eight years.[39] … His pattern of befriending vulnerable girls, engaging in illicit drug use with them, and then sexually abusing them, and his utter lack of remorse, in my view, speak to a considerable risk of reoffending and point to the need for a lengthy prison sentence for the protection of the public.[52] I am therefore pronouncing a sentence which will take effect immediately and will be served concurrent with the sentence now being served. Specifically, … will be sentenced to eight years, nine months. As he has already served three months of his current five‑year sentence, the total length of … incarceration on all offences will be nine years.
  2. R. v. P.J.H., 2025 BCSC 405 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.