Possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm, Possession of a weapon contrary to a prohibition order

R. v. Kipp

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked5 years and 6 months in custody1
Judge imposedTwo years less a day conditional sentence on house arrest, then 3 years probation1
5 years and 6 months less custody than the Crown asked

A conditional sentence is served in the community, usually under house arrest. It counts as no custody here.

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked5 years and 6 months in custody
Judge imposed2 years less a day conditional sentence
Defence asked2 years less a day conditional sentence
For possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm (CC 95(1)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 14% of the maximum. Read the section.

Daniel Kipp pleaded guilty to two counts of possessing a restricted firearm and one count of possessing a firearm while prohibited, after police found two restricted firearms and loaded magazines in his backpack in Nanaimo in May 2023. The Crown sought five and a half years in federal custody. Justice Hamilton imposed a conditional sentence of two years less one day on house arrest followed by three years of probation, citing Gladue factors and his exceptional efforts at rehabilitation.

In the judge's words

Of all the aggravating and mitigating factors, what stands out the most in this case are: 1) the Gladue factors that apply in Mr. Kipp's case; and 2) Mr. Kipp's already exceptional efforts to rehabilitate himself.

1

The record

Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
2 years less a day conditional sentence1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: K.A. Grant
Defence: S.J. Roy

Sources

  1. R. v. Kipp, 2025 BCSC 2616 Court decision, CanLII, December 18, 2025[64] As mentioned above, the Crown seeks a global sentence of five and a half years' federal imprisonment.[66] Mr. Roy, counsel for Mr. Kipp, agrees that the Crown has accurately stated the normal range for sentences for the offences. However, Mr. Roy submits that a global sentence of two years less one day followed by three years' probation is a fit and appropriate sentence in this case. He submits that the sentence ought to be served in the community as a conditional sentence order.[1] THE COURT: The offender, Daniel Kipp, previously entered a guilty plea to the following offences:[86] Of all the aggravating and mitigating factors, what stands out the most in this case are: 1) the Gladue factors that apply in Mr. Kipp's case; and 2) Mr. Kipp's already exceptional efforts to rehabilitate himself.[109] Balancing all of the relevant factors and considering the significant time that you have already spent at VIRCC, and then on house arrest at TRC, I sentence you to a global sentence of two years less one day imprisonment, to be served in the community on house arrest, subject to conditions which I will specify. … [113] The conditional sentence order will be followed by a three‑year probation period
  2. Criminal Code, s. 95 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. Kipp, 2025 BCSC 2616 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.