Assault by choking, suffocating or strangling, Sexual assault

R. v. G.J.L.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked3 years in custody1
Judge imposed27 months in custody (6 months concurrent on choking count)1
285 days less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

Maximum10 years
Crown asked3 years in custody
Judge imposed27 months in custody
Defence asked2 years less a day conditional sentence
For assault by choking, suffocating or strangling (CC 267(c)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 10 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 22% of the maximum. Read the section.

After a trial, the offender was found guilty of sexual assault and assault by choking. The Crown sought three years in custody and the defence a conditional sentence of two years less a day followed by three years' probation. Justice Smith imposed 27 months in a federal penitentiary, finding that a sentence under two years would not adequately address denunciation and deterrence, so a conditional sentence was not available. The judge declined to make a SOIRA order.

In the judge's words

In my view, a sentence below the low end of the range would not be a fit sentence. In particular, I am not satisfied that a sentence of less than two years' imprisonment would adequately account for the sentencing principles of denunciation and deterrence. As I am not satisfied that a sentence of less than two years would be a fit sentence, a conditional sentence order is not available.

1

The record

Prior convictions
0 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
2 years less a day conditional sentence1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: C. Cook
Defence: J. Michi

Sources

  1. R. v. G.J.L., 2025 BCSC 1288 Court decision, CanLII, June 20, 2025[9] Crown submits a fit sentence is three years in jail on Count 1 with a concurrent sentence of six months on Count 2.[10] Defence submits there should be a conditional sentence of two years less a day followed by three years' probation.[18] There are also mitigating circumstances. Mr. … does not have a criminal record.[23] … In my view, a sentence below the low end of the range would not be a fit sentence. In particular, I am not satisfied that a sentence of less than two years' imprisonment would adequately account for the sentencing principles of denunciation and deterrence. As I am not satisfied that a sentence of less than two years would be a fit sentence, a conditional sentence order is not available.[27] On Count 1, I sentence you to 27 months in jail. On Count 2, I sentence you to six months in jail. The sentence on Count 2 is concurrent to the sentence on Count 1. The total sentence is 27 months.
  2. R. v. G.J.L., 2025 BCSC 1288 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.