Employing a foreign national not authorized to work in Canada

R. v. R.E.W.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown askedFine1
Judge imposed$2,000 fine (12 months to pay); no probation; two-year common law peace bond1

What the law allows

Maximum2 years
Crown askedFine
Judge imposedFine
Defence askedFine
For employing a foreign national not authorized to work in Canada (IRPA 124(1)(c)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 2 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with no mandatory minimum. Read the section.

The offender pleaded guilty partway through trial to unlawfully employing a foreign national without a work permit as a live-in nanny for about 13 months, contrary to s. 124(1)(c) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act. The Crown sought the maximum fine of $50,000 and probation; the defence sought a fine of $1,000 to $2,500. Justice Riley imposed a $2,000 fine with no probation, finding the gravity of the offence and the offender's moral culpability at the low end of the spectrum.

In the judge's words

To sum things up, this was a case involving the unlawful employment of a single foreign national, as a live in nanny, for a period of some 13 months. The offender made some effort to comply with the regulatory scheme, and her offending conduct arose from a serious error in judgment in proceeding with the nanny arrangement prior to obtaining the required approval.

1

The record

Prior convictions
0 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
Fine1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: C. Hough
Defence: D. Butcher, K.C.

Sources

  1. R. v. R.E.W., 2024 BCSC 740 Court decision, CanLII, May 2, 2024[148] The Crown argues for a fine in the amount of $50,000.[149] … The defence argues for a fine in the range of $1,000 to $2,500.[59] … To complete the picture, I will add that she has no prior criminal record.[145] To sum things up, this was a case involving the unlawful employment of a single foreign national, as a live in nanny, for a period of some 13 months. The offender made some effort to comply with the regulatory scheme, and her offending conduct arose from a serious error in judgment in proceeding with the nanny arrangement prior to obtaining the required approval.[155] I conclude that a fine of $2,000 is a fit and proper disposition in this case.
  2. Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, s. 125 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. R.E.W., 2024 BCSC 740 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.