Possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm, Possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, Uttering threats to cause death or bodily harm

R. v. Fuller

  • Below the Crown's ask
  • On release at the time

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked42 months in custody1
Judge imposed40 months global (3 years on s. 95 with 6 months concurrent for threats, plus 4 months consecutive on s. 88), less 923 days pre-sentence credit1
60 days less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked42 months in custody
Judge imposed40 months in custody
For possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm (CC 95(1)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 23% of the maximum. Read the section.

Darren William Fuller pleaded guilty to uttering threats, possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm, and possession of a weapon for a dangerous purpose, arising from threats against his former intimate partner in 2022. Crown and defence jointly proposed sentences totalling 42 months; Justice Blok imposed a global sentence of 40 months, less 923 days of pre-sentence credit, after reducing the s. 88 sentence by two months to reflect time spent at a remote residential treatment facility on bail. The judge described the offences as extraordinarily threatening and violent while recognizing the offender's remorse and potential for rehabilitation.

In the judge's words

There is no way to overstate this. This was extraordinarily threatening and violent behaviour. It is hard to imagine what would go through the mind of a victim faced with this kind of threatening and violent behaviour, together with a display of firearms available to carry out the threat. These offences are very, very serious.

1

The record

Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
On bail1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: R. Roach
Defence: D. White

Sources

  1. R. v. Fuller, 2024 BCSC 1523 Court decision, CanLII, July 19, 2024[49] Crown and defence also agree that the sentences in each of those indictments are to be consecutive to one another. These proposed sentences total 42 months.[2] Darren William Fuller is before the Court for sentencing following his guilty pleas to three charges on two different indictments[7] … Mr. Fuller was arrested for breaching his release conditions, as he had been prohibited from having any contact with Ms. W. as a result of a release order made on February 1, 2022. … [51] … (2) Mr. Fuller was bound by no‑contact orders at the time of his offending against Ms. W.; and (3) he was subject to weapons prohibitions at the time he was found to be in possession of weapons.[55] There is no way to overstate this. This was extraordinarily threatening and violent behaviour. It is hard to imagine what would go through the mind of a victim faced with this kind of threatening and violent behaviour, together with a display of firearms available to carry out the threat. These offences are very, very serious.[60] … the total sentence that has been proposed is one of 40 months, which is 1200 days, against which Mr. Fuller has credit at one and a half to one, totalling 922 and a half days, rounding up to 923, for a remaining sentence of 277 days. … [62] So the total sentence is 40 months. You have spent 615 days in custody and the credit given for that is 923 days, and so the remaining sentence that you will serve is 277 days.
  2. R. v. Fuller, 2024 BCSC 1523 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.