Sexual interference

R. v. L.S.B.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked6 years in custody1
Judge imposed6 years in custody1

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked6 years in custody
Judge imposed6 years in custody
Defence asked3 years in custody
Minimum1 year
For sexual interference (CC 151), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with a mandatory minimum of 1 year. The sentence imposed is 43% of the maximum. Read the section.

The offender was convicted after trial of sexual interference with a child between five and eight years of age over about three years, while in a position of trust. The Crown sought six to seven years and the defence three years. Justice Lyster imposed six years, citing the child's young age, the repeated abuse, the breach of trust and the harm caused, balanced against a low risk to reoffend and no prior record.

In the judge's words

I pay particular heed to what the court said in Friesen about the harmfulness of sexual offences against children. … The most relevant authorities presented to this court suggest that a sentence range for an offender who committed the offences which … has been found to commit and in … circumstances would be five to seven years.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
0 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
3 years in custody1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: C. Pine
Defence: M. Goulden

Sources

  1. R. v. L.S.B., 2024 BCSC 1455 Court decision, CanLII, July 22, 2024[7] I must determine a fit and appropriate sentence for … offences. In brief, the Crown submits that a sentence of six to seven years is appropriate, while the defence submits that the appropriate range is three to five years, and that a sentence of three years should be imposed.[7] I must determine a fit and appropriate sentence for … offences. In brief, the Crown submits that a sentence of six to seven years is appropriate, while the defence submits that the appropriate range is three to five years, and that a sentence of three years should be imposed.[48] In her submissions, Crown counsel identified the following mitigating circumstances, all of which I accept are present. First, … does not have any previous criminal record.[72] I pay particular heed to what the court said in Friesen about the harmfulness of sexual offences against children. … The most relevant authorities presented to this court suggest that a sentence range for an offender who committed the offences which … has been found to commit and in … circumstances would be five to seven years.[87] … I sentence you to six years for your conviction under s. 151 of the Code.
  2. R. v. L.S.B., 2024 BCSC 1455 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.