Possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm, Possession of a controlled substance

R. v. C.B.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown askedNot recorded
Judge imposedTwo years less a day conditional sentence (no full-term house arrest), then 2 years probation; $1,000 fine for cocaine possession1

A conditional sentence is served in the community, usually under house arrest. It counts as no custody here.

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Judge imposed2 years less a day conditional sentence
Defence asked2 years less a day conditional sentence
For possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm (CC 95(1)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 14% of the maximum. Read the section.

The offender, arrested three months after his 18th birthday, pleaded guilty to possessing a loaded prohibited or restricted handgun and possessing cocaine found in his vehicle. The defence sought a two-year-less-a-day conditional sentence; the provincial and federal Crowns took no fixed position, the provincial Crown arguing for house arrest throughout any conditional sentence. Chief Judge Borden imposed a conditional sentence of two years less a day followed by two years of probation, plus a $1,000 fine on the drug count, citing his youth, lack of record, an Impact of Race and Cultural Assessment, and his compliance with bail.

In the judge's words

In balancing the competing variables confronting C.B. against the governing jurisprudence, I conclude that sentencing him to a conditional sentence order of two years less a day to be followed by probation for two years is consistent with the fundamental purposes and principles of sentencing.

1

The record

Prior convictions
0 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
2 years less a day conditional sentence1
Mandatory minimum
Found unconstitutional or not applied under a binding ruling1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: Steven Degen, Timothy McLaughlin, K.C.
Defence: Patrick MacEwen

Sources

  1. R. v. C.B., 2023 NSPC 68 Court decision, CanLII, November 29, 2023[5] The Defence argues that a conditional sentence of two years less a day is appropriate.[33] But for the seminal case of R. v. Nur, 2015 SCC 15, C.B. would be facing a three-year mandatory minimum sentence.[1] C.B., a first-time offender, has pleaded guilty to the following offences[59] In balancing the competing variables confronting C.B. against the governing jurisprudence, I conclude that sentencing him to a conditional sentence order of two years less a day to be followed by probation for two years is consistent with the fundamental purposes and principles of sentencing.[63] Accordingly, the sentence will be apportioned as follows: … Code s. 95(1): Two years less a day condition sentence order, to be followed by a two-year probation order. … CSDA s. 4(1): $1000.00 fine.
  2. R. v. C.B., 2023 NSPC 68 Court decision, Courts of Nova Scotia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.