Manslaughter with a firearm

R. v. Ratchford

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked12 years in custody1
Judge imposed12 years imprisonment less 948 days credit (3,432 days left), 5 years concurrent on two firearms counts1

What the law allows

MaximumLife imprisonment
Crown asked12 years in custody
Judge imposed12 years in custody
Defence asked12 years in custody
Minimum4 years
For manslaughter with a firearm (CC 236(a)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to life imprisonment, with a mandatory minimum of 4 years. Life is drawn at 25 years for scale. Read the section.

Samuel Kenneth Pechanec Ratchford pleaded guilty to manslaughter for fatally shooting a friend with a rifle outside his home near Terrace, and to two firearms counts for carrying a loaded handgun a month earlier. Crown and defence jointly proposed 12 years for the manslaughter with five years concurrent on the firearms counts. Justice Brundrett accepted the joint submission, citing the use of a firearm Mr. Ratchford was prohibited from possessing and his extensive record.

In the judge's words

[45] The main offence involves the manslaughter of a promising young man with a family. The offence has significant aggravating features--most notably the use of a firearm, of which Mr. Ratchford should never have been in possession. Mr. Ratchford's extensive record and the tragic circumstances of the offence are overall supportive of deterrence and denunciation being the prime sentencing principles at play here.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
12 years in custody1
Mandatory minimum
Applied1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: S.K. Hopkins, K.E. Costain
Defence: P.S. McMurray

Sources

  1. R. v. Ratchford, 2023 BCSC 2492 Court decision, CanLII, October 23, 2023[40] As noted above, counsel have made a joint submission in this case in favour of a 12-year sentence on the manslaughter charge and a concurrent five-year sentence on each of the two firearms charges.[40] As noted above, counsel have made a joint submission in this case in favour of a 12-year sentence on the manslaughter charge and a concurrent five-year sentence on each of the two firearms charges.[12] The offence of manslaughter attracts a four‑year minimum sentence when committed with a firearm.[1] Mr. Ratchford entered a guilty plea on Indictment 35725‑3 to manslaughter in relation to an incident occurring on January 29, 2022.[45] The main offence involves the manslaughter of a promising young man with a family. The offence has significant aggravating features--most notably the use of a firearm, of which Mr. Ratchford should never have been in possession. Mr. Ratchford's extensive record and the tragic circumstances of the offence are overall supportive of deterrence and denunciation being the prime sentencing principles at play here.[51] I hereby sentence you on File 35725‑3 to a period of 12 years' imprisonment, less 632 days' time served, which will be credited at the usual 1.5 to 1 ratio of 948 days' credit, for a sentence left to be served of 3,432 days. [52] On File 35970‑2, that is the two firearms charges, I sentence you to five years concurrent on those two counts, to run concurrently with the 12-year manslaughter sentence, with the same credit provided.
  2. R. v. Ratchford, 2023 BCSC 2492 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.