Break and enter a dwelling-house, Aggravated assault

R. v. Suel

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked4 years in custody1
Judge imposed30 months custody (6 months for break and enter, 24 months for aggravated assault), less credit for time served1
560 days less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

MaximumLife imprisonment
Crown asked4 years in custody
Judge imposed30 months in custody
For break and enter a dwelling-house (CC 348(1)(d)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to life imprisonment, with no mandatory minimum. Life is drawn at 25 years for scale. Read the section.

Daniel Mark Suel pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and break and enter with intent after he and a co-accused attacked a 76-year-old man in his RV in Chilliwack. The Crown sought four years less time served; the defence sought a conditional sentence. Justice Walkem imposed 30 months in custody with credit for time served, finding that the Crown's proposal did not address his Gladue factors and noting his steps toward rehabilitation.

In the judge's words

The evidence before me was that Mr. Suel had taken considerable steps to rehabilitate himself. And though I agree a custodial sentence of some form is appropriate, I find that imposing the term of imprisonment of four years proposed by the Crown would not be just in the circumstances.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: M.L. Wray
Defence: J.D.A. Watt

Sources

  1. R. v. Suel, 2023 BCSC 2288 Court decision, CanLII, December 14, 2023[22] The Crown proposes a sentence of four years less time served.[1] THE COURT: On December 1st, 2019, the accused, Daniel Suel, and co-accused, Marco Verhage, assaulted the victim, … who was 76 years old at the time.The evidence before me was that Mr. Suel had taken considerable steps to rehabilitate himself. And though I agree a custodial sentence of some form is appropriate, I find that imposing the term of imprisonment of four years proposed by the Crown would not be just in the circumstances.[69] In my view, a custodial sentence of 30 months with credit for time served is appropriate to be assessed between the two charges as follows. For the charge of 348(1)(a), I sentence Mr. Suel to six months of incarceration with credit for time served. On the count of aggravated assault, contrary to s. 268(2) of the Criminal Code, I sentence Mr. Suel to 24 months with any additional credit for time served to be deducted from that amount. … [19] Mr. Suel was arrested and detained on December 15, 2019, and remained in custody until May 5th, 2020, following a s. 525 application. In total, he served 140 days, or 200 days with credit, for a total of approximately seven months.
  2. Criminal Code, s. 268 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. Suel, 2023 BCSC 2288 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.