Possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm, Possession of a weapon contrary to a prohibition order, Impaired operation of a conveyance, Failure or refusal to provide a sample, Possession of a firearm knowing its possession is unauthorized, Occupant of a motor vehicle knowing there is a firearm, Careless use or storage of a firearm, Contravention of firearm storage regulations

R. v. Arsenault

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked5 years in custody1
Judge imposed4 years 6 months (4 years on s. 95(1) plus 6 months consecutive on s. 117.01, other counts concurrent), two $2,000 fines, 1-year driving prohibition after release, lifetime s. 109 prohibition, DNA1
185 days less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked5 years in custody
Judge imposed4 years and 6 months in custody
Defence asked3 years in custody
For possession of a loaded prohibited or restricted firearm (CC 95(1)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 32% of the maximum. Read the section.

Donald Francis Arsenault was found guilty after trial of impaired operation, refusing a breath sample and several firearms offences, including possessing a loaded handgun in his car's glove box in Halifax in August 2019 while subject to firearms prohibition orders. The Crown sought 5 years for the loaded firearm offence plus one year consecutive for the prohibition-order breaches; the defence sought 3 years with the breaches concurrent. Justice Norton imposed 4 years for the loaded firearm offence plus 6 months consecutive, for a total of 4 years and 6 months, finding the unexplained handgun in a vehicle in a dense urban area closer to the "true crime" end of the spectrum, along with two $2,000 fines and a one-year driving prohibition.

In the judge's words

Possession of an unexplained, unlicensed handgun while driving in a densely populated urban area is in my view closer to the “true crime” end of the spectrum.

1

The record

Prior convictions
5 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
3 years in custody1
Mandatory minimum
Found unconstitutional or not applied under a binding ruling1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: Stephen Anstey
Defence: Ian Hutchison

Sources

  1. R. v. Arsenault, 2022 NSSC 325 Court decision, CanLII, November 15, 2022[21] The Crown argues that the appropriate sentence is 5 years. Mr. Arsenault argues the appropriate sentence is 3 years. … [29] … The Crown’s position is that Mr. Arsenault should serve one year for each offence, concurrent to each other, but consecutive to the sentence under s. 95(1).[21] The Crown argues that the appropriate sentence is 5 years. Mr. Arsenault argues the appropriate sentence is 3 years. … [29] … Mr. Arsenault submits that the term of the sentence should be 6 months on each offence, both concurrent to the sentence under s. 95(1).[20] Pursuant to s. 95(2)(a) Mr. Arsenault is liable to a period of incarceration not exceeding 10 years, the mandatory minimum for a first offence having been struck down by the Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. Nur, 2015 SCC 15.[1] After trial, by Decision dated August 19, 2022, I found Donald Francis Arsenault guilty of offences pursuant to ss. 320.14(1)(a), 320.15(1), 94(1), 86(1), 92(2), 95(1), 86(2), and (2 counts)117.01: R. v. Arsenault, 2022 NSSC 242.[7] Mr. Arsenault’s court record discloses that he was convicted of trafficking in controlled substances three times between 2010 and 2017, and on one occasion received a sentence in a federal penitentiary. He has two prior convictions relating to possession of firearms, for which he received a 12-month sentence of incarceration on each.[22] … Possession of an unexplained, unlicensed handgun while driving in a densely populated urban area is in my view closer to the “true crime” end of the spectrum.[32] … Accordingly, I sentence Mr. Arsenault to 6 months on each of the offences under s. 117.01, concurrent to each other but consecutive to the sentence imposed for the s. 95(1) offence. … [35] … In this case that would mean in addition to his sentence of 4 years, 6 months on the firearms offences. … [55] Mr. Arsenault shall be credited for the 13 days’ time served on remand at a rate of 1.5:1 for a total credit of 20 days.
  2. R. v. Arsenault, 2022 NSSC 325 Court decision, Courts of Nova Scotia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.