Manslaughter with a firearm
R. v. Gilpin
- Below the Crown's ask
Sentence and the Crown's position
What the law allows
Kyle Tyler Gilpin was found guilty by a jury of manslaughter, as a lesser included offence of second degree murder, for fatally shooting his stepfather with a rifle. The Crown sought nine years' imprisonment and the defence four years. Justice Church imposed six and a half years' imprisonment, less 1148 days of credit for presentence custody, citing his youth, intoxication, lack of a criminal record and steps taken to address his alcoholism.
In the judge's words
1However, as was the case in R. v. Johnny, which was also a case of near murder, Mr. Gilpin was young and intoxicated. He had no criminal record, had not previously been a violent person, and has taken positive steps to address his alcoholism.
The record
- Convicted of
- Manslaughter with a firearm (CC 236(a))
- Prior convictions
- 0 prior convictions1
- At the time of the offence
- Not stated1
- Defence asked for
- 4 years in custody1
- Mandatory minimum
- Found unconstitutional or not applied under a binding ruling1
- Appeal
- Not yet checked
- Counsel
- Crown: J.D. Hempstead; H.J. Shook
Defence: A.P. Kaiser; C.A.H. Hauser
Sources
- R. v. Gilpin, 2022 BCSC 658 Court decision, CanLII, March 8, 2022
[47] The Crown submits that a fit sentence in the circumstances is nine years' imprisonment less credit for time spent in pre-sentence custody.
[48] Defence counsel relied on the following case authorities in support of his submission that the range of sentence in the circumstances of this case is between three and five years' imprisonment, and that a fit sentence is four years
[44] … The mandatory minimum term of four years' imprisonment for manslaughter with a firearm was recently struck down by this court in the case of R. v. Penner, 2022 BCSC 175, and thus for the purposes of this sentencing hearing, there is no mandatory minimum term of imprisonment.
[1] … His stepson, Kyle Tyler Gilpin, was charged with his second degree murder
[42] … At the time of the offence, Mr. Gilpin had no prior criminal record or any outstanding charges.
[67] However, as was the case in R. v. Johnny, which was also a case of near murder, Mr. Gilpin was young and intoxicated. He had no criminal record, had not previously been a violent person, and has taken positive steps to address his alcoholism.
[69] So Mr. Gilpin, for the offence of manslaughter contrary to s. 236 of the Criminal Code, I sentence you to six and a half years' imprisonment. You have been in custody on this charge for 765 days. You will be credited with 1148 days of presentence custody at a rate of 1.5 to one
- R. v. Gilpin, 2022 BCSC 658 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia