Second degree murder

R. v. T.A.L.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown askedLife, no parole for 15 years1
Judge imposedLife imprisonment, no parole for 14 years1
1 year less parole ineligibility than the Crown asked

Both are life sentences, so the bars compare how long before parole can be considered.

What the law allows

MaximumLife imprisonment
Crown askedLife, no parole for 15 years
Judge imposedLife, no parole for 14 years
Defence askedLife, no parole for 10 years
For second degree murder (CC 231(7)), the Criminal Code makes life imprisonment mandatory; the judge sets how long before parole can first be considered. Life is drawn at 25 years for scale. Read the section.

The offender pleaded guilty to the second degree murder of a stranger, whom he attacked with a machete in Stanley Park in February 2017. The Crown sought parole ineligibility of 15 to 18 years and the defence 10 years. Justice Gerow imposed life imprisonment with no eligibility for parole for 14 years, finding deterrence, denunciation and protection of the public paramount given the planning, violence and the offender's future dangerousness, while weighing his guilty plea, remorse, mental illness and Gladue factors.

In the judge's words

While no single sentencing objective trumps others, it is my view that in the particulars of this case, the sentencing principles of deterrence, denunciation, and the protection of the public are paramount and call for a setting of the parole ineligibility above the minimum range.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
Not recorded
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
Life, no parole for 10 years1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: D.P. Montrichard
Defence: J. Heller

Sources

  1. https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2022/2022bcsc425/2022bcsc425.html Court decision[2] On this sentencing hearing, the Crown takes the position that the appropriate sentence for … is life imprisonment without eligibility for parole for at least 15 to 18 years.[3] The defence submits that this is not a case which should be taken out of the median of cases, and parole ineligibility should be set at 10 years.[59] While no single sentencing objective trumps others, it is my view that in the particulars of this case, the sentencing principles of deterrence, denunciation, and the protection of the public are paramount and call for a setting of the parole ineligibility above the minimum range.[62] … I sentence you to life imprisonment with no eligibility for parole for 14 years for the second degree murder of …
  2. R. v. T.A.L., 2022 BCSC 425 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.