Aggravated assault

R. v. Fierheller

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked3 years and 2 months in custody1
Judge imposed3 years and 2 months (all but one day satisfied by pre-sentence custody credit), then 3 years probation1

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked3 years and 2 months in custody
Judge imposed3 years and 2 months in custody
Defence asked3 years and 2 months in custody
For aggravated assault (CC 268), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years, with no mandatory minimum. The sentence imposed is 23% of the maximum. Read the section.

James Fierheller pleaded guilty to aggravated assault after punching a man seated on his walker outside a Vancouver supportive housing residence; the victim fell, struck the ground and died two days later. Crown and defence jointly proposed the sentence. Associate Chief Justice Holmes imposed three years and two months, all but one day satisfied by credit for pre-sentence custody, followed by three years of probation, finding that his mental illness, substance abuse and homelessness played a significant role in the offence.

In the judge's words

It is clear that Mr. Fierheller's mental health, as well as his substance abuse, which may also be seen as an aspect of his mental health condition, played a significant role in the commission of the offence, as Ms. Dickson submitted. So too did Mr. Fierheller's persistent homelessness.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
4 prior convictions, 1 violent1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
3 years and 2 months in custody1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: D.L. Mulligan
Defence: S.N. Dickson

Sources

  1. R. v. Fierheller, 2022 BCSC 2050 Court decision, CanLII, September 15, 2022Crown and defence counsel now join in proposing the sentence that the Court should impose.…[13] I am satisfied that the sentence counsel jointly propose strikes the difficult balance in this case between the public interest and Mr. Fierheller's own interests.…to a total period of incarceration of three years and two months, of which one day imprisonment is to be new time.Crown and defence counsel now join in proposing the sentence that the Court should impose.…[13] I am satisfied that the sentence counsel jointly propose strikes the difficult balance in this case between the public interest and Mr. Fierheller's own interests.…to a total period of incarceration of three years and two months, of which one day imprisonment is to be new time.[2] Mr. Fierheller entered a guilty plea on May 30 of this year to the aggravated assault of[6] I infer also that those too played a part in Mr. Fierheller's criminal convictions of which there are four, described in the Crown's written submissions as follows:[5] It is clear that Mr. Fierheller's mental health, as well as his substance abuse, which may also be seen as an aspect of his mental health condition, played a significant role in the commission of the offence, as Ms. Dickson submitted. So too did Mr. Fierheller's persistent homelessness.[14] As I noted, Mr. Fierheller has been in custody for a very substantial period. He will be sentenced ‑- you can stay seated, Mr. Fierheller ‑- to a total period of incarceration of three years and two months, of which one day imprisonment is to be new time.…[16] In addition, Mr. Fierheller, you will be subject to a probation order of the maximum length, three years,
  2. Criminal Code, s. 268 Record, Justice Laws Website
  3. R. v. Fierheller, 2022 BCSC 2050 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.