Manslaughter with a firearm, Indignity to human remains

R. v. Deo

  • Below the Crown's ask

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked10 years in custody1
Judge imposed7 years in custody (5 years manslaughter plus 2 years consecutive for indignity to a body), less 239 days' credit1
3 years less custody than the Crown asked

What the law allows

MaximumLife imprisonment
Crown asked10 years in custody
Judge imposed7 years in custody
Defence asked6 years in custody
Minimum4 years struck down
For manslaughter with a firearm (CC 236(a)), the Criminal Code currently allows up to life imprisonment, with a mandatory minimum of 4 years that courts have struck down as unconstitutional. Life is drawn at 25 years for scale. Read the section.

Harjot Singh Deo pleaded guilty to manslaughter with a firearm and to offering an indignity to a dead body, after an illegally possessed handgun he was carrying discharged and killed his 19-year-old girlfriend in his bedroom in 2017, and he then set fire to the vehicle containing her body. The Crown sought a total of ten years and the defence six years. Justice Watchuk imposed five years for manslaughter and two years consecutive for the indignity offence, a total of seven years less 239 days' credit, giving weight to his guilty pleas, youth and low risk to reoffend while treating the reckless carrying of a loaded illegal firearm as the most aggravating factor.

In the judge's words

Rehabilitation, one of the objectives of sentencing, is one of the primary sentencing objectives for Mr. Deo as a youthful first offender. It is significant that Dr. Lohrasbe diagnosed Mr. Deo as treatable, and found him sincerely remorseful and committed to living a productive life.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
0 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
6 years in custody1
Mandatory minimum
Found unconstitutional or not applied under a binding ruling1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: S. Nahal, K. Boland, F. Nejatali
Defence: R. Fowler, K.C.

Sources

  1. R. v. Deo, 2022 BCSC 1835 Court decision, CanLII, October 18, 2022[141] The Crown submits that the fit sentence for Mr. Deo is a total of ten years comprised of six years for manslaughter and four years consecutive for the indignity offence.[142] On behalf of Mr. Deo, it is submitted that a fit sentence is a global sentence of six years incarceration, with six years for manslaughter and 18 months for the indignity to be served concurrently.[118] Pursuant to s. 236(a) of the Code, the offence of manslaughter with a firearm is punishable by a minimum sentence of four years imprisonment and a maximum sentence of life in prison. This court, however, has recently held that provision to be unconstitutional: Penner, at para. 186.[9] Mr. Harjot Singh Deo was born in September 1997.[58] Mr. Deo was 19 at the time of the offences and has no criminal record.[155] Rehabilitation, one of the objectives of sentencing, is one of the primary sentencing objectives for Mr. Deo as a youthful first offender. It is significant that Dr. Lohrasbe diagnosed Mr. Deo as treatable, and found him sincerely remorseful and committed to living a productive life.[158] In crafting the sentence, Mr. Deo will have credit for the 159 days he spent in pre-trial custody at the rate of 1.5 days for every day spent in pre-trial custody, or 239 days credit. … [163] Having determined that the fit sentence will be served consecutively: firstly, with regard to the offence of manslaughter of … you are sentenced to five years incarceration. … [164] To be served consecutively, the sentence for the offence of indignity to a dead human body is two years. … [165] The total sentence is seven years. You will have credit for time served.
  2. R. v. Deo, 2022 BCSC 1835 Court decision, Courts of British Columbia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.