Sexual interference

R. v. C.A.L.

A publication ban applies. The offender is not named.

Sentence and the Crown's position

Crown asked3 years and 6 months in custody1
Judge imposed3 years 6 months imprisonment; DNA, s. 109 order, SOIRA 20 years, s. 161 order1

What the law allows

Maximum14 years
Crown asked3 years and 6 months in custody
Judge imposed3 years and 6 months in custody
Defence asked2 years less a day conditional sentence
Minimum1 year struck down
For sexual interference (CC 151), the Criminal Code currently allows up to 14 years when the Crown proceeds by indictment, with a mandatory minimum of 1 year that courts have struck down as unconstitutional. The sentence imposed is 25% of the maximum. Read the section.

The offender was convicted after trial of sexual interference with a child over a period of years; a sexual assault conviction was stayed under the Kienapple principle. The Crown sought three and a half to four years of imprisonment; the defence sought a conditional sentence of two years less a day. Justice Muise imposed three years and six months, finding a conditional sentence was unavailable and would not be fit in any event.

In the judge's words

C.A.L. subjected his victim to regular and repeated acts of sexual violence over four years. He did not plead guilty. He did not express remorse.

1

The record

Convicted of
Prior convictions
0 prior convictions1
At the time of the offence
Not stated1
Defence asked for
2 years less a day conditional sentence1
Mandatory minimum
Found unconstitutional or not applied under a binding ruling1
Appeal
Not yet checked
Counsel
Crown: Peter Craig, Q.C.
Defence: Raymond Jacquard

Sources

  1. R. v. C.A.L., 2021 NSSC 365 Court decision, CanLII, November 18, 2021[19] The Crown recommends the following sentence: - 3.5 to 4 years’ imprisonment;[21] The Defence recommends 2 years’ less a day imprisonment to be served in the community under a conditional sentence order (“CSO”).[6] … The 1 year minimum penalty has been declared unconstitutional by our Court of Appeal in R. v. Hood, 2018 NSCA 18.[54] The mitigating circumstances in the case at hand include the following: … 1. He has no criminal record.[73] … C.A.L. subjected his victim to regular and repeated acts of sexual violence over four years. He did not plead guilty. He did not express remorse.[91] So, I sentence you, C.A.L., to three years and six months’ imprisonment, consecutive to any sentence you may be serving.
  2. R. v. C.A.L., 2021 NSSC 365 Court decision, Courts of Nova Scotia

publicly
Sentence Watch is part of Publicly: sites built from government and court records, with every fact linked to its source. Publicly is not affiliated with any government. Visits are counted with Google Analytics, which sets cookies.